• ChuckLopez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    As much as I’d like to laugh as any Russian military stupidity, the aircraft in the picture doesn’t appear to have propellers attached, so it’s likely in some form of maintenance. Without the weight of engines and props, any strong wind over the wings is likely to move the plane around quite a lot. Putting tires on the wings disrupts the lift and helps keep the plane from moving around in storms.

    • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That feels like a better explanation then the other theory that they are used for some form of anti-drone tech.

      Would the tires do anything to protect them other than blunt the damage? Ignoring the fact that each tire conveniently has a bomb sized hole in each section?

      I would imagine shrapnel would have an easier time going through a tire then through the exterior of the plane. And those bombs already do that.

      • m0darn
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tires are very tough. Aircraft skin is very thin. I think tires would help reduce damage from shrapnel, but agree that weight and airfoil disruption is also a very plausible expansion.

    • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I don’t see how this would provide any additional benefit, even if tires were literally the only thing you had to work with

    • shyguyblue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      My guess: You can remove the tires for flight, paint adds weight and I don’t see the Russian army scraping off the current paint without fucking up the primer/anti corrosion layer.

        • shyguyblue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Light paint keeps the heat away, so it’s the default. Plus, this entire kerfuffle has been a matter class in lack of planning. They never thought they would need it, so why bother painting 50+ year old planes another color.

        • Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          In the case of strategic bombers, anti-flash white is a key feature to reflect as much of the thermal pulse of a nuclear detonation as possible; theoretically you want these planes to survive the apocalypse that they’re unleashing to return to base and do it again.

  • theodewere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    most likely explanation: somebody’s uncle owns a tire factory and is a good salesman… or even more likely, somebody stole a bunch of military tires from the Army, and then sold them to the Air Force as an effective “drone deterrent”…

  • Chickenstalker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    4chan /k/ calls it “cope tires”. Fun fact, /k/ came up with the term “cope cages” for the Russian tanks too.

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is not tire from car, is special military shield unit. dumb westerners have no clues on our advanced military gearings.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago
    • Tyre is a city in the middle east.
    • Tires are the round black rubber things you drive on.
    • Tired is how I feel when people spell the second like the first.