cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/42447832

Malaysia emerged as a major destination for U.S. waste after China banned U.S. waste imports in 2018.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250626132109/https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2025-06-26/malaysia-bans-us-plastic-waste-what-will-california-do


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

  • Buske@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    GOOD, STOP TAKING OUR TRASH! Make us deal with the problem and come up with a real long term solution, Tired of these short term “Solutions”

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    We may need to find an actual solution to all that plastic.

    But I’m hearing innovative new ideas in that field. One researcher has proposed an interesting solution, it’s called “aluminum cans” it sounds crazy, and who knows if it could possibly work at scale, but it’s a neat idea.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Sure, but that plastic lining is a tiny amount of plastic, practically insignificant by mass.

        And sure, glass works too, that’s fine with me. But it’s not simply better. It comes with the downsides of being heavier (requiring more energy to transport), less durable, and requiring more energy to recycle. It’s a trade off.

        Currently, aluminum has the highest rate of recycling of all beverage materials. So why not double down on the most successful packaging type in the history of recycling?

      • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The argument against glass is the weight. It increases CO2 emissions from the transportation.

        Waxed paper and cardboard seem like good options for non liquids.

        I feel like refillable bottles would be amazing for stuff that doesn’t perish.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Dump it in the nearest red state as a thank you for pushing so hard to elect a candidate who thought tariffs had no bad consequences .

  • DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Plastic waste is a dilemma for the whole world. Unless its intended to become the fuel source for the next evolution of Earth’s dominant global species of course.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sink it in concrete blocks next to Lindberg field SanDiego international airport so they can finally expand it. But definitely don’t add a trolley station anywhere near. Inconvenient transportation is why we travel. That and getting covid.

  • renrenPDX@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I just read about toxic tofu production in Indonesia (nearby country) that burns plastic as a primary fuel source to fry up tofu. We’re surrounded by plastics and have nowhere to put the waste.

  • kemsat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Maybe use some that AI shit to engineer some microbes that can eat plastic. Or I dunno make less plastic waste?

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sigh, just send it to us in Sweden, we’ll burn in cleanly and recover energy from it.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        You can it’s just expensive and requires additional fuel.

        It sometimes requires “reburning” the combustion exhaust at higher temperatures. But combustion can eventually break down the majority of molecules into something safe. And then if things still need to be removed from the exhaust, you can use processes similar to the catalytic converter in your car, but again, not cheap.

        • Maestro@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Interesting, but it does sound like they are burning the general waste left over after splitting for recycling. I.e. not a lot of plastic.

          • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Well they’re splitting recycling, but plastic, generally speaking is not recyclable. So it’s the paper and metals that are being split off, the plastic goes in with everything else.

            There are some plastics that are theoretically recyclable, but even that isn’t really recycling is down-cycling turning a plastic into an interior plastic that isn’t recyclable at all. Or repurposing and reusing a plastic, perhaps as pillow stuffing or melting it down with other things to make road paving material.

            But the life of plastic is never a cycle, it’s a path that can sometimes be extended a bit.