• phx
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Nope, other side of the country. Among other things, they’d indicated that the septic field was in good health when in fact it was failing and they’d had to have it pumped out multiple times.

    It had issues shortly after move in, and when my friends got it pumped the company recognised them as an address they’d visited frequently for the previous several years, which basically meant documented proof the previous owners knew it was defective.

    It was a costly thing to have the lawn torn up and a new field created and I’m not sure if the settlement covered it all, but AFAIK they did get a decent amount after all was said and done.

    LPT: If you’re buying a house with septic, it might be a good idea to check if the local companies that deal with such are aware of issues the sellers are not disclosing. It’s an expensive and messy fix

    • a_lemmy_user@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Before you buy a house it’s best to invite as many professionals as you know to come look it over. Contractors are always going to be expensive, and they’re only human so plumbers, electricians, landscapers, if you can, have them look over the house. We didn’t do our due diligence and it’s been a pain in the ass.

      • phx
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, the actual “Home Inspectors” often don’t do shit and have little to no liability for missing important stuff