Because 1) language requires no translation from experience 2) language is relatively easy to record, communicate and analyze.

Thus it is inevitable that our language will slide from “reflecting reality” to “reflecting itself”.

Consider where that’s going.

  • not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Yeah, this is why an adult can learn a new language in a couple of months, whereas a newborn takes several years to grasp just the basics, and more than a decade to get good at it.

    To misquote Eddie Harris, “It’s no big deal to learn another [language] once you know one. All you gotta do is have nerve.”

    • rainrain@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I personally think the second language is easier to pick up because languages are 99% alike. But that is beside my point.

      My point is that slide into self-reflectingness.

      Like one of those old xerox machines. A copy of a copy of a copy… till the original image is gone, replaced with something crazy.

  • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    You might be interested in reading up on the debate of “Prescriptive vs Descriptive” approaches in a linguistics context.

      • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Sure - Wikipedia says it better than I could hope to:

        As English-linguist Larry Andrews describes it, descriptive grammar is the linguistic approach which studies what a language is like, as opposed to prescriptive, which declares what a language should be like.[11]: 25  In other words, descriptive grammarians focus analysis on how all kinds of people in all sorts of environments, usually in more casual, everyday settings, communicate, whereas prescriptive grammarians focus on the grammatical rules and structures predetermined by linguistic registers and figures of power. An example that Andrews uses in his book is fewer than vs less than.[11]: 26  A descriptive grammarian would state that both statements are equally valid, as long as the meaning behind the statement can be understood. A prescriptive grammarian would analyze the rules and conventions behind both statements to determine which statement is correct or otherwise preferable. Andrews also believes that, although most linguists would be descriptive grammarians, most public school teachers tend to be prescriptive.[11]: 26

        • rainrain@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Yeah, I get the basic idea. I was hoping for a little more on the actual implications tho. Preferably in conversation form rather than copypasted.