“We don’t have any way of taking care of a dog,“ an officer told the dog’s owner, Bryan Pennington.

  • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes but nobody needs training to not murder a dog. Only punishment will work with these kinds of psychopaths. They didn’t kill the dog because they lacked training. They killed the dog because they enjoy murder.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mmm, assuming that not all police officers are sadistic asshats, I imagine many of them just being scared and only remember being told to shoot first, ask questions later. Training and changing the culture within police organizations will do a lot there. Also punishment

      • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        These particular officers are the only ones who would be punished for killing the dog. Also, they weren’t under attack. They just decided they’d rather kill the dog than to not kill the dog.

      • Doug Holland@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mmm, assuming that not all police officers are sadistic asshats

        Serious question: Why would you assume that?

        • Phoenixz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          For the same reason I assume not all gays are pedophiles. Only really really dumb people think like that. Know better, be better.

            • Phoenixz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That has shit to do with either math or reality. If you’re ubhad a job where you were the breadwinner for your family you might understand that things aren’t always that easy.

              • Doug Holland@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                What’s ubhat? And whatever makes you imagine someone who disagrees with you must’ve never held a job?

                • Phoenixz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  “If you ever had”… mobile phone sometimes messes up writing.

                  And it’s not because you disagree with me, it’s because you’re saying dumb stuff. Generalizations like that are always wrong and yes I see the irony in that statement.

                  There are more than rnot police officers that see the problems and have little options to do something about it as real life kinda saddles you up with things like responsibilities for wife and kids… Life is not black and white and it’s very easy for you to make these bold claims while not knowing the real reasons for so many police officers not to speak up.