• ModestMeme@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Congress wouldn’t let him. The President doesn’t write the laws and can only ask Congress to do so.

        • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Progressives would need to down ballot vote for that to happen. Would also need to support and fund progressive candidates.

          Progressives currently can’t even do the bare minimum (actually voting), in large enough numbers to matter.

          • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            Progressives currently can’t even do the bare minimum (actually voting), in large enough numbers to matter.

            Of course not!

            They’re doing something far more critical and effective!

            They’re withholding votes based on purity testing and otherwise being manipulated into nullifying themselves by online manipulation by the right.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Technically you need 51 or 50 + VP tiebreaker unless a Republican filibusters then you need 60.

          You can change senate rules if you have a comfortable majority but I’m pretty sure they can filibuster that, too, and it might backfire like removing the filibuster for SCOTUS and cabinet picks has.

        • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Executive order deporting anyone in senate not voting for his agenda?

          /s (but only for a few months, then headlines will explain how it’s apparently a real option)

        • Wiz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes and, they also needed to break a filibuster by the Republicans, which took 60 votes in the Senate, despite severe illness and Republican shenanigans. It was a huge lift to get what we got.

        • That Weird Vegan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          The funny thing is, americans already kinda have universal healthcare… just with a middleman. Where do they think those insurance premiums are going?

      • Michael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        He never seriously fought for universal healthcare. He stopped advocating for it before he even started fighting. As soon as he got a “reality check”, not a word of support for universal healthcare was ever uttered by him to the best of my knowledge. Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong, though.

        • SuperCub@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          This is exactly it. Obama waged no fight a pre negotiated good healthcare plan to get us the heritage plan.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      He did give free or extremely cheap healthcare to tens of millions of americans and brought down proces nationwide by creating competition.

      And if not for independent Joe Leiberman being the holdout for the 60 it took to pass any form of the bill he would have accomplished more.