• BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I find that the metal ones work better and are easier to keep clean. The meat one I had just didn’t last long enough to be useful before it started to smell bad.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    No. I bought one but ended up continuing my practice of looking at the meat and then taking my chances.

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I don’t eat meat, and don’t seem to need them for other foods. I do use an IR thermometer though to check the temperature of the pan before putting food on it.

  • Canopyflyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Yes, I have several of various types and use them extensively.

    They are not necessary to cook, they are necessary to cook consistently.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Only until I get the hang of a cooking technique - once I figure out something always takes 20 minutes to get there, I just do 20 minutes.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Yes. My meat thermometer is a fire and forget type where it automatically shuts off the heat once it reaches a certain temperature or preconfigured meat setting. It makes the air fryer a wonderful appliance when working on other foods simultaneously. Plus, I don’t have to worry about unsafe temps, or overcooked food.

  • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am an experienced cook and use one to produce consistent, on-target results. It more often prevents over-cooking, not under-cooking.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes. Accurate temperatures guarantee good results. Sous vied is also wonderful for stress free prep of expensive meats.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sous vide was a game changer for me. I don’t use mine often but break it out when I want to convince people I am not terrible at cooking.

      Just wish that it wasn’t necessary to use so much plastic for it. If there was any sort of plant-based film that food could be sealed in instead, it’d be perfect.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Try the reverse sear method instead. You get sous vise like results with no plastic, no water bath, just an oven and a pan.

        I use my toaster oven to do the precook while searing off vegetables in my pan or baking in the larger oven, then get the pan wicked hot and sear the steak. Fast, excellent mutlitasking. Works well for pork chops too.

        • Psythik@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The whole benefit of sous vide is that you can completely forget about the meat—even leave it for days at a time—and it will never overcook. Just take it out anytime, slap it on the stove for a quick sear, and get a perfect medium rare every time.

          As someone with extreme ADHD, this is why I always sous vide my steak. Reverse sear is slow, yes, but there’s still a chance to forget about it and let it overcook.

          • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I find it to basically be exactly the same, but almost no setup. No filling a pot/container with water, putting the stick heater in, ziplocking or vacuum sealing the meat, then waiting an hour+ for it to hit temperature.

            Toss the steaks on a tray, preheat toaster oven in 5 min to 225f, prep and cook the rest of the meal and the sear off the steaks after 20min. Easy as fuck.

            • Drusas@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              My new stove/oven has air sous vide, as they call it. You still have to bag up whatever you’re cooking, but otherwise it’s a lot less work. Seems to work just fine, but it does take a little longer than liquid sous vide.

                • Drusas@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  It does work. And it is not rebranded convection. In order to cook sous vide, you need to be able to consistently maintain pretty low temperatures. That’s what the oven offers and it works well.

        • Drusas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think most people who do sous vide cooking also use the reverse sear method.

          • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Hopefully as an alternative at times and not as an addition. Doing both wouldn’t have any advantage, as both work to take the internal temp of the meat to a specific state and hold it there.

      • Xraygoggles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        We use silicon bags and magnets. You let the top of the bag drape over the side of the bucket(tub? basin?) and hold it in place with a few magnets. From what I can tell the results are the same for the steaks and meat we cook and none of the sketchiness from eating slow heated plastic.

      • yesman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s also great for cheap beef. You can throw a tri-tip or brisket in there and run it for literal days until you have meat as tender as the deli counter, while also being med-rare throughout.

        • Fondots@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think possibly the best steak I ever had/made was a cheap chuck steak that I gave a nice long sous vide treatment

          There is a whole lot of flavor there, but it can be as tough as shoe leather, but with sous vide it came out as tender as any filet, but way beefier

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Absolutely, and not just for meats. Anything that has a temperature requirement for best cooking method.

    An instant-read thermometer is a game changer to make sure fish, meat, and anything else that needs it is properly cooked, and just as importantly, not over-cooked.

  • vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Only when I’m slow roasting something that take hours. I got a bluetooth meat thermometer as a gift a little while back and it’s really convenient. There’s an app that goes with it. I just set what type of meat it is and insert the thermometer and let it cook. The app tells me when the food is ready.

    But that’s only for large pieces of meat that take a long time. For anything on the stovetop or grill, or any smaller pieces of meat in the over/airfryer I just do it by feel. I’ve been cooking long enough that I can tell when a piece of meat is ready just by pushing on it to feel the firmness. And I have a pretty intuitive sense for how long something takes to cook.

    • Colalextrast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I also received a Meater as a gift - but I use it for basically any meat that goes in the oven or gets grilled. And I’ve found myself putting more meats in the oven so I can use it.

      The thing is fantastic and has changed my life - especially when it comes to poultry

      • vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I haven’t found a need for it with poultry. I also don’t really cook whole birds, though. Mostly just wings or breasts. I don’t need a thermometer for those.

  • BanjoShepard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes. Especially for chicken breasts. It’s easy enough to know for sure they’re done, but they’re much easier to eat as soon as they hit 155F. My immune system has never questioned my chicken, but my taste buds are very thankful for the meat thermometer.

  • ornery_chemist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Yes, on the rare occasion I cook meat. Too unpracticed otherwise. I originally got one because I’m colorblind and was scared of undercooking red meat and tired of eating leather. As a bonus, I used it to get the temperature right when I got into fancier teas and inadvertently trained myself to judge the temperature of water pouring into my mug by the sound it makes within a couple °C, which is kinda neat. Now, if I could figure out how to do something similar so I stop overcooking food, that’d be grand…