“According to the bill text, “a picture, image, graphic image file, film, videotape, or other visual depiction” of any media that “appeals to the prurient interest in nudity, sex, or excretion” would be considered criminal. In other words, if you have an old VHS tape of some Cinemax-style smut stashed away in your garage, you could, under this law, be considered to be harboring deeply illicit materials.”


Originally Posted By u/WhyIsItAlwaysADP At 2025-05-12 05:37:44 PM | Source


    • TootSweet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      They want it to be ambiguous. So that they can interpret it whatever way they want on a whim. Don’t like this political opponent? Send the Gestapo after them. One of your own found to be in possession of pornography? Oh, that’s not porn, it’s “artistic nudes.”