alessandro to PC GamingEnglish · 1 day agoTariffs could increase tech prices by up to 70% and reduce GDP by $69 billion according to CTA reportwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square48linkfedilinkarrow-up1287arrow-down13
arrow-up1284arrow-down1external-linkTariffs could increase tech prices by up to 70% and reduce GDP by $69 billion according to CTA reportwww.tomshardware.comalessandro to PC GamingEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square48linkfedilink
minus-squarenovacomets@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down14·15 hours agoWhy do you use wikipedia as a source given the statement from staff who run wikipedia?
minus-squareSeleni@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·15 hours agoObviously you’ve never heard of the concept of ‘citing credible sources’.
minus-squarenovacomets@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down8·15 hours agoIt’s because of the concept of credible sources that I ask why you use wikipedia given the statement from staff that run wikipedia
minus-squareSeleni@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 hours agoThat’s an ad hominem and not a valid argument. I know the internet breeds bad habits in people, but you really should try to do better. ‘What the staff says’ has nothing to do with citing and linking to primary sources, which is what is important and the focus of this discussion.
minus-squareinclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 hours agoJust donvote, tag for future downvotes and move on. A defender of Neo-Nazis isn’t ever going to defend their stance with facts and reality.
minus-squareSeleni@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·38 minutes agoThat wasn’t for the Nazi, it was for other people reading what the Nazi wrote. I don’t want people to get taken in by the poorly structured arguments and the constant moving of goalposts.
Why do you use wikipedia as a source given the statement from staff who run wikipedia?
Obviously you’ve never heard of the concept of ‘citing credible sources’.
It’s because of the concept of credible sources that I ask why you use wikipedia given the statement from staff that run wikipedia
That’s an ad hominem and not a valid argument. I know the internet breeds bad habits in people, but you really should try to do better.
‘What the staff says’ has nothing to do with citing and linking to primary sources, which is what is important and the focus of this discussion.
Just donvote, tag for future downvotes and move on. A defender of Neo-Nazis isn’t ever going to defend their stance with facts and reality.
That wasn’t for the Nazi, it was for other people reading what the Nazi wrote. I don’t want people to get taken in by the poorly structured arguments and the constant moving of goalposts.