• GreenIcePear@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    He didnt have much for the case of defamation, which is why he lost that case against Magnus. It is however fair that Magnus has no proof for him cheating in OTB matches, and keeping that up without proper evidence could end up in a successfull defamation lawsuit.

    This doesnt necessarily change anything for OTB tournaments, which are regulated by FIDE, who had the report on their investigation postponed until October (I believe).

    I agree it is wild his chess.com account was reinstated after their report in which they claimed to have proof for iirc hundreds of times cheating in online matches!

    • bjorney
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      they claimed to have proof for iirc hundreds of times cheating in online matches!

      They merely stated his play was, across many games, indistinguishable from a cheater, they didn’t have actual hard proof that he was cheating.

      If they had actual proof they wouldn’t have needed to settle

        • Furbag@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a bit more nuanced than that. Chess engines exist, and computers have the ability to always make the most correct move given the current board state 100% of the time, even when viable alternatives exist. That’s how they tend to catch cheaters. If you’re out of book moves and making engine optimal moves every turn, there’s a strong suspicion that you are using a computer to cheat. Even Grandmasters play sub-optimal moves, so when novices come out swinging with near-100% accuracy on their scorecard, it raises a lot of alarm bells.