• RideAgainstTheLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Are you saying the AT Protocol is not self-hostable, or that BlueSky isn’t? Because if it’s possible to create a BlueSky competitor that uses the AT Protocol, then this criticism isn’t valid. If someone can in theory create an open source BlueSky clone, then it seems like it renders Activity Pub redundant. I’m genuinely curious, I have been trying both out for a while.

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Both. ATProto is still centralized, you can host your own profile data but you still need the central service to log in and see it.

      BlueSky claims they’ll open-source the central service too but they’ve got no incentive to do so.

      • RideAgainstTheLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Thanks for the explanation. I hope that the fact they’ve set out to create it in the first place shows their intention to open source it - it would be a 180° villain arc move not to

        • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Sadly, it’d be entirely in keeping with every single other corporate social media site ever.

          Letting you host your own profile data is just a move to save themselves some hosting costs, every user who stays locked into their system and hosts their own data means they’ll be able to start making money that much faster when they finally hit market saturation and turn heel to enshittify themselves for profit.