• Victor Villas
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Has anybody put up an aggregator of reasons to avoid specific brands? Most big brands would end up there for one reason or another, but still, would be good to have a quick resource to consult. My current method is to do a web search for “$BrandName$ controversy lawsuit human rights” or something like that, but nowadays alt-right extremists are polluting the news space with spurious “”“controversies”“” (like for Bud Light and Levi’s).

  • MooseLad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “If you are going into Wendy’s I will pay for you to go to McDonald’s instead,”

    McDonald’s has been caught union busting multiple times.

    • grteOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      “joked Simon Peacock”

      It was a quip in the moment.

      • MooseLad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean sure, but the joke undercuts the message a bit and makes him sound ill informed. It’s like being anti war and saying “If you’re thinking about joining the US military, I will pay you to join Russia instead.”

        • grteOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not really. It was a quick joke, they had a laugh. It’s not a big deal at all.

          • MooseLad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I didn’t say it was a big deal. But the joke doesn’t make sense and is therefore not a good joke. It’s just not a good look when the first thing you see in an article is a contradiction. These people need media coaching.

            • grteOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s a perfectly fine joke. They are protesting Wendy’s actively at the moment and not McDonald’s. The guy didn’t do a research project before his quip, who cares. You are saying there is an issue here when there isn’t one, at all.

              • MooseLad@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                A research project? It would’ve taken a single Google search to find an appropriate restaurant to name. Just because you’re apathetic and lazy, doesn’t mean everyone else has to be or has to excuse it. And a lot of people who read that article are going to point it out. If you look misinformed, people aren’t going to take you seriously. It harms the cause, whether it should or not. That’s why media training is necessary. It’s not a “perfectly fine” joke.

                • grteOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Yes it is. There is no issue here, you are inventing one. 99.99% of people are not going to care about this. At all.