• sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I can absolutely understand why he’d say that.

    It’s a tough thing, complex. Human beings can be (creative) hacks too, copying something without any soul. But humans only have two hands and need to sleep and eat. An AI just needs a power supply and an Internet connection.

      • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        A perfectly modernist take.

        The problem is that modernism is wrong. The universe cannot be explained through that outdated mode of thinking, it just leads to totalitarianism and human suffering.

      • 5trong5tyle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        If that is your true view on what it means to be human, I’m truly sad for you. An AI system can’t experience joy, loss, sadness or happiness. There’s few animals around that can do this consciously. Humans are one of them. There is so much more to life than just chemical processes in your brain (that haven’t even been shown to happen before the thought happens or their connection to thought in general). Life is shared in a community and experienced together, humans aren’t meant to be solitary processing units, they’re group animals and that experience creates something not replicable with emotionless systems.

        This is also why AI art fails. It doesn’t know how to connect to others and take input from experiences, because it doesn’t experience. It’s solipsist in its nature.