• Ymer@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    Just bought the oldest kid their first sleeping bag: From Nordisk rather than Marmot.

  • OmegaLemmy@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I thought the north face was a niche podcast group when I first saw the logo (I live outside of USA and EU) and was REALLY disappointed when I learned it’s just the same thing as Gucci or something

    • JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      North Face used to have good products, then got big and especially during COVID when a lot of middle class took up outdoor activities during travel restrictions it went the way of patagucci

  • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    To be fair, Patagonia is more ethical than some of the EU ones, all things considered.

    (Although it’s absolutely ridiculously expensive)

  • Asetru@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    The last time I needed to get a jacket, I did some Internet searches and asked in three different stores, one name kept popping up every single time: Vaude seems to take this whole sustainability thing quite serious, manufactures part of their collection in Germany and guarantees fair conditions for work they outsourced.

    • Synapse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Decathlon is involved with child and possibly slave labor through it’s Asian suppliers, also the company still operates in Russia under a barely disguised name.

    • orenishii@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes but a lot of their stuff is made under poor and toxic circumstances by people who get paid very little. Not the best imho

    • robador51@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Correct. I can recommend it, their home brands are cheap, and the quality is generally good.

    • sunstoned@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I absolutely love Scarpa. They make the only footwear that really, really, fits my weird feet off the shelf. I just wish they made ski boots for the sane.

  • sudneo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Vibram is also in the list (IT), and it makes rubber soles (or shoes) that are used by many other brands. I love Garmont for hiking shoes.

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was surprised by this when I first learned it back in the day, perception make me think it was Japanese (paired with the fact their sizes tend to run small).

      I used to love the quality of their t-shirts and jackets; but have struggled to find anything that appealed to me from them over the last few years…

      …sad reading their Wikipedia page to see they’re seriously struggling financially, and this one quote really felt like a kick in the ‘nads: “A 2023 Observer article referenced critics suggesting that Superdry was a “dad” brand "beyond redemption”.

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sounds like bad corporate decisions more than anything. Lacoste and Ralph Lauren thrived as the epitome of dad brands for decades until they realized they were cool among drug dealers and pivoted to the related aesthetics with shirts that are 80% logos and shit

        • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          No doubt bad corporate decisions played a significant role in their misfortunes.

          Unlike Lacoste (tennis) and Ralph Lauren (polo) though, Superdry never had that ‘old money’ white people sports appeal, which is what made them somewhat successful as a ‘dad brand’.

          So while it’s not impossible for them to dig themselves out of the hole they are currently in, I think it’ll be more of an uphill struggle overall.

  • Frostbeard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Don’t get anything made of GoreTex as that is produced by American comoany W. L. Gore & Associates. Fjellräven has decent cotton products that lasts. Personally I prefer Norwegian brand Bergans. You also have Härkila (finish) and Klättermusen (Swedish) last one primally focuses on light weight climbing gear

    • Lasagna@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Don’t get GoreTex because it’s using PFAS chemicals which are harmful to the nature we’re out there to enjoy.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Don’t get goretex for the simple reason that the patent has expired anyway so any company can make the exact same product under another name anyway.

      • d00ery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Now that is interesting to know!

        I was just reading a review of jackets where the praise the goretex brand. Though I guess there’s new technology from gotetex

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          They have a pretty substantial marketing budget to make people believe that their product is better but once the patent expires then that’s all you have to rely on, brand recognition.