Grandmother gets X-rated message after Apple AI fail
www.bbc.co.uk
Louise Littlejohn said she was shocked and then laughed when she received the error strewn voicemail transcription.

A woman from Dunfermline has spoken of her shock after an Apple voice-to-text service mistakenly inserted a reference to sex - and an apparent insult - into a message left by a garage.

~The is what Mrs Littlejohn saw on the voicemail screen in the Phone app on her iPhone after receiving a voicemail from the garage.~

  • Graphy@lemmy.worldEnglish
    16·
    15 hours ago

    I love the jank message summaries

    I got one the other day that summarized a message from my 75 year old mom as a conspiracy theory. I can’t imagine having the confidence to mark a clients message as a conspiracy theory even if it 100% was.

    Here’s the summary:

    Conspiracy theory about government agencies being privatized for profit.

    Original text:

    They would turned it into a private owned so they can profit from it. That’s why they changing all the government agencies and turn it into profitable businesses for them. See how all the big corporations are lined up with trump.

    pic

    • Tregetour@lemdro.idEnglish
      1·
      7 hours ago

      Surely people see this for what it is, a censorship mechanism that relies on people’s laziness and preference for convenience for effectiveness.

      Even if Apple Intelligence were good, why would anyone in their right mind allow a middleman to interfere with their ability to communicate with others?

    • Zak@lemmy.worldEnglish
      4·
      13 hours ago

      And people wonder why I have no interest in getting a newer phone with an AI thing on it.

      • Blaster M@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        9 hours ago

        Visual Voicemail has been a thing for literal decades. The older ai models (before they were called such) were even more jank

      • Graphy@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        15 hours ago

        Yeah like I can’t say it’s not a conspiracy theory (that I agree with) but marking it is still very… bold?