Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.socialM to Religious Cringe@midwest.social · 2 days agoThis guy is clearly not right in the headmidwest.socialimagemessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1244arrow-down110
arrow-up1234arrow-down1imageThis guy is clearly not right in the headmidwest.socialLanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.socialM to Religious Cringe@midwest.social · 2 days agomessage-square90fedilink
minus-squareinb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-216 hours agoWell since you said it… I now need you to prove its well charged.
minus-squareDr. Zoidberg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·16 hours agoWell since you said that you need to prove to me it’s not well charged.
minus-squareunderscore_@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·15 hours agoClearly they are miss-underestimating the implications of the axiom habet multam industriam or… something like that?
minus-squareI Cast Fist@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·14 hours agoNow that you all said your stuff, I want proof that you said it, as per the lorem ipsum eunt romanes axiom
minus-squareinb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·14 hours agoWhat is this supposed language you SAY exists? I need proof of this alleged… “Latin”.
Well since you said it… I now need you to prove its well charged.
Well since you said that you need to prove to me it’s not well charged.
Clearly they are miss-underestimating the implications of the axiom habet multam industriam or… something like that?
Now that you all said your stuff, I want proof that you said it, as per the lorem ipsum eunt romanes axiom
What is this supposed language you SAY exists? I need proof of this alleged… “Latin”.