• iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    If Saudi Aramco was a country, it would be the fourth biggest polluter in the world after China, the US and India, while ExxonMobil is responsible for about the same emissions as Germany, the world’s ninth biggest polluter, according to the data.

    Wouldn’t that be counting the same emissions twice? As the fuel they produce is likely to be used in countries like China, India, Germany. In other words: a calculation as usefull as taking the sum of assets and liabilities in a balance sheet.

    It’s not like they make the fuel, and then burn it, for the fun of it. It’s supply matching demand. Take away a supplier, another will substitute.

    • RandAlThorOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It’s about scale, not counting twice.

      • iii@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Yet in attempting to do the first, they do the latter.