• catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 hours ago

    No, human language.

    Well, they’ve also been used for code, but that’s still designed for humans. I doubt you could use something off the shelf for binaries.

    • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      And with machine code, you got to keep track of what’s in the stack, CPU registers, … to make a sense of what the code and the next branch command does. It’s completely unalike processing human language. LLMs aren’t really set up to do it.