• Nils
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    disingenuous

    Lol, you want to debate, but you had to invent arguments and assign them to me. This is ridiculous and you are very dishonest.

    My text has several points, none of them you addressed and just insisted on spilling around your warmongering.

    Even when we seem to agree that gov spending should be focused on something else than warfare - I find ironic your conclusions, “Russia started a war, and it was used to provoke war on Russia”.

    I deny this, but examples?

    You know which ones, do not play coy

    I feel like you don’t really care what people write, you just use whatever to defend war, either that or your LLM/Call center script is broken.

    • humanspiralOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      As mentioned, I did not understand your point, and went through possible interpretations.

      • Nils
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Oh yes, it is very difficult to ask someone to explain something. It is easier to go from “it is wrong to justify an invasion by fear of nukes” to “all foreign influence is evil”.

        I re-read my text a few times, and I could not find anywhere saying that helping a nation build a dam, help with infrastructure or logistics projects, create economic blocs or easing bureaucracy for transit as being evil. Nice gymnastics over there to spill your warmongering propaganda.