• slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh no! gaming division went from $3.2B to $2.5B while our datacenter division went from $30B to $35B

    • filister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      To be honest their gaming division could have been a lot bigger chunk if NVIDIA wasn’t so greedy with their VRAM, prices and disastrous launch of the 50th series with fake MSRP, very mediocre gains against last gen and even higher prices.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          if only there were two competitors willing to provide entry level and mid grade cards at prices that a normal person can afford.

          because right now nvidia is selling their shit to middle aged, high earning cucks imho

  • Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    As long as scarcity increases revenues from enterprise customers, they have no incentive to increase the supply of gaming GPUs back to a level that fulfills all demand at a price that doesn’t rip off consumers.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      the COVID classic… i swear sony was holding back stock to drive scarcity after supply chain issues have been resolved.