• Akasazh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    That last bit is the dark ages myth, mostly created in the 19th century.

    The middle ages were way better than is commonly suggested. Aside from a couple of major epidemics, but we’ve recently seen that we’re not immune to that.

    O yeah and quite a few warmongering autocrats, about territory and religion. We’ve risen above that too, haven’t we?

    ::: spoiler

    We haven’t

    :::

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That last bit is the dark ages myth, mostly created in the 19th century.

      No.

      The Dark Ages myth is separate from the idea that the fall of the Roman Empire negatively impacted Europe in a massive way.

      • Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        For whom though? For the average citizen in Europe there wouldn’t really have been a gibsonian fall.

        What’s the massive negative impact you’re taking about?

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 minutes ago

          Yes, for the average citizen. Pottery in Britain didn’t return to pre-Roman standards for 300 years. Farming tools and techniques in Western Europe would not recover for some 500, and even then only with the arrival of Islam in Spain. Kitchen utensils in peasant housing in rural Italy saw a sharp decline that would not recover for 700 years, and the quality of housing itself not for almost 1000. That’s not even getting into the non-archeological side of things, questioning the exact impact of trade, security, legal systems, widespread literacy…