• Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I mean, you could just not vote for the fringe parties then?

      (Oh, you already don’t do that? So it’s other people’s votes you want to cancel? See what I mean - arguing for a threshold is essentially arguing for less democracy.)

      • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not about cancelling anyone. It’s about not having to wait 200-300 days to get a new government after every election.

        I have often voted for very small parties and they never make it into the coalition. I really wouldn’t mind if they didn’t make it into Parliament either.

        It’s not like the BSW or FDP voters really lost that much - their parties would be doomed to be opposition anyway. Their voters knew that was a likely outcome based on the polls. And next election they might reach the threshold.

        But the country as a whole gains efficiency.

        • Vincent@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          The question then is: why did you vote for those very small parties? Why not just vote VVD? Then you’re basically sure that they’ll make the coalition, and your vote contributes to a nice and quick coalition process.

          (That said, I also strongly disagree that being in opposition means you can’t achieve anything. Look at the PVV, and how much they were able to make the other parties when they weren’t even part of the government. Looks at what Union is planning to do now because of AfD, without AfD having to be part of the coalition.)

          Edit: oh, and I forgot maybe the most convincing argument, for you: it doesn’t work. Reasonable thresholds do not lead to fewer parties.

          • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s not about fewer parties in elections, it’s about fewer parties in Parliament and quickly having a stable government.

            Your link is written by an idiot.

            In Germany you can still vote for a small party. If enough people do, the party gets 5%, or about 32 seats, which are enough MP’s to actually participate in the process without getting burned out.

            We could also start in the Netherlands with 2%, which is 3 MP’s.

            I think 4% (6 MP’s) would be better though.

            • Vincent@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              OK, if you’re dismissing a source just because it doesn’t fit your preconceived notions, even though it’s written by someone who’s literal job is to research the subject, and provides the numbers to back it up, then I’m not sure what we’re doing here.

              • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                22 hours ago

                Some people suck at their job.

                It is what it is.

                In any case, Germany will probably have a government within a month, two if things get crazy.

                And that’s cold hard facts.