The judge threatened to sanction the IG lawyers if they didn’t immediately rescind the request for an emergency hearing because she’s so busy with other cases caused by Trump.

  • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    The judge hasn’t yet decided whether the actions are illegal. If they are, then they will ultimately be put to a stop.

    But for now, the question at hand is whether there is an emergency. That is a completely separate from whether the actions are illegal.

    And if you wait three weeks to declare an emergency, then it’s not an emergency.

    • minnow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      In comparison, Reyes said, Trump needs only to provide Congress with 30 days’ notice and a written explanation to remove an inspector general.

      She cites the legal procedure in her comments declining the motion. If that’s not an acknowledgement of the illegality of what happened instead, what is?

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Everyone agrees IGs can be removed after 30 days notice.

        The legal question is whether in some cases they can be removed without 30 days notice. Team Trump argues they can, the IGs argue the only way they can be removed is with 30 days notice.

        The judge has to decide who’s right. Probably the IGs, but at this point it’s too late to reinstate them. So instead the IGs will have to argue for money damages.