Summary

A federal judge blocked Donald Trump’s attempt to fire Hampton Dellinger as head of the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), citing a 1978 law that allows removal only for “inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance in office.”

Judge Amy Berman Jackson reinstated Dellinger pending a February 26 hearing.

Dellinger called his firing illegal, saying, “The effort to remove me has no factual nor legal basis – none.”

The White House argues the law is unconstitutional, challenging limits on presidential power over independent agencies.

  • ryper
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The White House argues the law is unconstitutional, challenging limits on presidential power over independent agencies.

    These people clearly don’t understand what “independent” means.

      • Bizzle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Execute Trump, Musk, Vance, and every other politician aligned with them for treason.

      • zaphodb2002@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I dunno but one would hope he’d take advantage of this decision as effectively as he can, given that his office fights corruption and is threatened by said corruption. It’d be nice for something to matter.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Maybe don’t insist someone “better fucking do something” if you have no idea what they can do.

          The answer is that they can do nothing when the people in charge do not care about the law. But at least keeping this person in office pisses them off.

          • zaphodb2002@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            23 hours ago

            It’s not my job to know what the powers he has are. That’s why I’m not in his position. It’s well within my rights to demand my government do it’s damn job. If him keeping his job means nothing, why do we care in the first place?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              21 hours ago

              No one says you have to care or you’re not within your rights to demand anything. However, and this may come as a shock, the world does not revolve around you.

              And, believe it or not, I am within my rights to point out that you’re demanding someone do something when you don’t even know what they do and that’s silly.

              (I always love it when people get indignant at a person using their right to say critical things as if it somehow prevents them from saying what the person is criticizing.)

              Edit: I guess the downvoters don’t believe people have the right to criticize others. Not that I’m surprised considering the sense of entitlement I’ve seen around here lately.

              • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                18 hours ago

                I downvoted because you didn’t add anything to the conversation. Do you know what Dellinger can do now that he’s been reinstated? If so, tell us. If not, find out and tell us. If you don’t want to find out, that’s ok too, but in that case you don’t have to say anything. The route you chose did nothing to further the conversation, it just ended in you browbeating a fellow citizen for making a desparate plea in a desperate time.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  I’m not the one who demands he has to do something but is unable to articulate what he is supposed to do. If someone makes an unclear demand, I don’t think asking for clarification is beyond the pale. But I guess you do.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I really hope blue states are making contingency plans.

        It seems like no one in the US is taking this serioseriously… Canada is literally making war preparations.

        • PhAzE
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Canada is not making war preparations.

    • St3alth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      The domino effect, in the end America is left with no judges because they all got fired for supporting each other

          • stickly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Those judges aren’t on the Supreme Court (where this will eventually end up). Its the same as a Republican doing a performative protest vote against GOP legislation that goes through anyway. They get to save some face, but at the end of the day no harm no foul.

  • aarRJaay@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    Inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance in office, sounds like someone else we all know.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      Seems like a lot of good judges have been stepping up, his EOs have been getting blocked left and right, save for a couple judges who’s officially lost it and handed him a couple wins lol