• Kevin Herrera@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pessimistic: Apple lawyers have arguments prepared that DRM’ing individual components does not violate this law.

    Less Pessimistic: Apple got a sufficient head start in supporting third-party repairs that it would be beneficial for them to get this law passed so that other manufacturers scramble to catch up.

    • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not DRM, but Apple does signing of components.

      Apple doesn’t care because they already set their self repair program up exactly the way this legislation states. If you buy certain components you have to contact them for assistance activating them.

      • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Which is the type of repair bill I don’t want. I would like to just source a donor phone and transplant parts to make it work again, aka reducing wastes. (and protecting my bank acc)

        However, with a big player like Apple support this defective bill, it got a high chance to pass and set the standard.

        • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I get why they do some of it in the security components, really wish they just gave the user the option to trust after a big warning banner. Yes, someone could have hacked this faceid camera, but since I’m the one putting it in and not some badguy please just associate it with this device now.

          • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I agree. Security components, fine. Just let me skip over that.

            However, what on earth they need to serialize the monitor and battery?!?! Calibration? How come I don’t need calibration for my PC monitor nor my camera batteries? Does it work to its fullest? No. Does it work. Yes. That all I want.

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not DRM

        Apple doesn’t care […]. If you buy certain components you have to contact them for assistance activating them.

        You are contradicting yourself

        • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, I’m actually not. Digital Rights Management has a specific meaning. Apple pairs devices to each other cryptographically, but it has nothing to do with managing rights. You have to contact them to assist you in pairing the devices to avoid warnings, just like a repair center does, but you are not actually activating them with Apple.

          • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh, yeah, you are right. Sorry, I’m just too much used to calling DRM as Digital Restrictions Management.

            You have to contact them to assist you in pairing the devices to avoid warnings, just like a repair center does, but you are not actually activating them with Apple.

            Do you mean that the devices actually boot with the replacement parts, but they also show a warning about them? If so, did this change recently (as in, last few years), or was it always that way since digitally signed parts became a thing?

            • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t know if every replacement part is still bootable, but for some things it will boot up and warn you and disable some features like faceid.