fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 14 hours agoAt this rate, why not.mander.xyzimagemessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up1214arrow-down12
arrow-up1212arrow-down1imageAt this rate, why not.mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 14 hours agomessage-square60fedilink
minus-squarepeoplebeproblems@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·8 hours agoI think y’all are missing the point here. It’s really to justify the production and testing of an insanely large planet altering weapon that would create a really cool firework.
minus-squareJoeBigelowlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 hours agoActually, one of their feasibility assumptions is that the device is too large to be used militarily. https://arxiv.org/html/2501.06623v1#%3A~%3Atext=Confronting+the+escalating+threat+of%2CEnhanced+Rock+Weathering+(ERW).
minus-squarepeoplebeproblems@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 hours agoAh. I suppose building an 81 gigaton nuclear weapon wouldn’t be small. Let’s fire up the antimatter then!
minus-squarei_love_FFT@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·8 hours agoThe only way to convince conservatives to fight climate change is if we do it with guns and bombs
I think y’all are missing the point here.
It’s really to justify the production and testing of an insanely large planet altering weapon that would create a really cool firework.
Actually, one of their feasibility assumptions is that the device is too large to be used militarily.
https://arxiv.org/html/2501.06623v1#%3A~%3Atext=Confronting+the+escalating+threat+of%2CEnhanced+Rock+Weathering+(ERW).
Ah. I suppose building an 81 gigaton nuclear weapon wouldn’t be small.
Let’s fire up the antimatter then!
The only way to convince conservatives to fight climate change is if we do it with guns and bombs