I’m not sure if I get your point, as I’m sure happens to you quite often, are you calling the banning of discussion which is borderline illegal, inciting violence etc, and then the banning the discussion of that ban, a psyops campaign? I had to read comments in your Other Post to get a grasp of the situation.
I feel like you really should have noticed the signs that you’d taken a wrong turn in your life when Hexbear users starting backing you up.
They weren’t backing me up. Or are you referring to them?
What happened was I happened to step on an unlucky metaphorical giant hornet’s nest responding to someone who was randomly bringing up Luigi. If a form of advocacy is extreme enough, it causes a cautionary reaction, which is the most concise way I can put it. I then mentioned the whole thing elsewhere, but the ever-famous Blaze then asked me to not preach to the choir, instead saying I should tell everyone who was relevant to it. So I did, and that got removed by one of the mods of [email protected] who told me to bring the matter to [email protected] instead. So I complied again, doing that, and rather than being meditative, the response from all of them came off as vigilant, and then he posited the idea of bringing it back to [email protected] formatted as a “the mods of YPTB removed my inquiry” complaint. So, again, I complied, only for both of the people in charge there to shame me for my way of thinking and implying I did everything I did in an attempt not to comply. All because a hundred people held the position that the CEO’s murder was ethically unquestionable.
You can say that again.
I’m not sure if I get your point, as I’m sure happens to you quite often, are you calling the banning of discussion which is borderline illegal, inciting violence etc, and then the banning the discussion of that ban, a psyops campaign? I had to read comments in your Other Post to get a grasp of the situation.
I feel like you really should have noticed the signs that you’d taken a wrong turn in your life when Hexbear users starting backing you up.
They weren’t backing me up. Or are you referring to them?
What happened was I happened to step on an unlucky metaphorical giant hornet’s nest responding to someone who was randomly bringing up Luigi. If a form of advocacy is extreme enough, it causes a cautionary reaction, which is the most concise way I can put it. I then mentioned the whole thing elsewhere, but the ever-famous Blaze then asked me to not preach to the choir, instead saying I should tell everyone who was relevant to it. So I did, and that got removed by one of the mods of [email protected] who told me to bring the matter to [email protected] instead. So I complied again, doing that, and rather than being meditative, the response from all of them came off as vigilant, and then he posited the idea of bringing it back to [email protected] formatted as a “the mods of YPTB removed my inquiry” complaint. So, again, I complied, only for both of the people in charge there to shame me for my way of thinking and implying I did everything I did in an attempt not to comply. All because a hundred people held the position that the CEO’s murder was ethically unquestionable.