User growth is ‘stagnant’ on the platform formerly known as Twitter.

  • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    3 days ago

    You could also argue the price was worth the political influence it has given him. Probably made more money in other areas due to owning it.

    • adarza
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 days ago

      definitely, getting tangled in politics and buying the white house definitely paid for twitter.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      He didnt buy twitter to own it, he bought twitter to destroy it. Gradually scattering the users onto their respective echo chamber platforms and controling the mainstream narrative as they do so.

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      That won’t stop him from lording it over and blaming his subordinates as if it were personally their faults.