MiniDiscs for recording, MD data for recording, and MiniDV cassettes will also be abandoned.

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Biggest one could take 2TB per disc

    I mean it’s cool for a disc, but HDDs still beat that, Seagate just released a 36TB HDD to mass market, optical always lags behind on storage density and speed

    • endofline
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      From wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archival_Disc

      Sony used Archival Disc in their Optical Disc Archive professional archival product range, and aimed to create at least a 6-TB storage medium. As of 2020, they offered 5.5 TB Optical Disc Archive Cartridges.[14][15][16]

      That limit I mentioned has nothing with the ‘technological limit’. Simply enough they lost with the adoption - if the clients wanted, they would get bigger archival discs.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’m aware, I’ve done heavy research for my own mass cold archival plans.

        It’s a physics problem is why it lags behind HDDs so much, and to reach that 6TB on optical it’s a cartridge with literal multiple discs inside. Adoption or no, it was never going to reach storage density parity with HDDs. Hell, even SSDs are having a difficult time taking on HDDs storage density

        • endofline
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Optical drives already are surpassing magnetic or even ssd. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_data_storage it’s more advanced version of optical drives, for obvious reasons it’s just a prototype and most likely it will stay so for quite a long time but still, optical storage hasn’t reached the limit.