• Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 hours ago

    No. Are we gonna have to defend encryption against overreaching EU GO’s every month now? We should make it an offense to bring it up for the next 5-10 years, and then they can try again, pffff

    The problem with the house analogy, is that now EVERYONE can just walk through your front door. People also don’t accept that, but that part of the reality she is demanding is omitted.

  • ISOmorph@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    “When we have a search warrant and we are in front of a house and the door is locked, and you know that the criminal is inside of the house, the population will not accept that you cannot enter.”

    With the amount of people having been wrongfully murdered by police during raids, I can tell you that I will not only accept, but even encourage that the general populace can protect themselves with locked doors.

    “Anonymity is not a fundamental right“

    Get bent Cathy

  • plactagonic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I love how the discussion goes in my country - police lobby for unlocking encryption “just for them” and NÚKIB (national bureau for cybersecurity) openly advising how to correctly encrypt everything.