• cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It’s not an either/or thing, both can be bad, both should be banned or at least heavily regulated. Right now we got one banned so far so I’ll take it

    • LostWon
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The single one they banned was the only one that leaned more to the left in terms of content overall. (The left vs. right dichotomy remains a relevant descriptor as long as major parties define themselves in this way.) Even people who want all social media banned should see a problem in the lopsidedness of this outcome and the problem it poses for democracy.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It did lean to the left…until they “tweaked” the algorithm to push more right-wing content

        • LostWon
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Yeah they did do what they could to appease their critics/advertisers (a little over a year ago I think?) but the user base was ignoring it and still favouring leftist content even after the algorithm tweak you mention, if only slightly. In the Pew-Knight study from last summer, it was also only second to Twitter among users who use the site to get news on political issues. Keeping in mind that everyone whose job is to do or talk about politics is on Twitter and only some of them are on the other platforms, I think that means a lot.

          • takeda@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            They do whatever works for Chinese interests.

            TikTok isn’t being banned, it was asked to be majority owned by an American company so it can’t be influenced by China.

            A normal business would prefer to get some money than no money.

            The fact that they refuse to do it is clear that its value only exists if it is controlled by Chinese government.

    • takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      or at least heavily regulated

      That’s the core reason for requirement to sell it. Right now there’s no way to regulate it. It is an app that influences 17 million Americans controlled by a country that right now regularly conducted cyber attacks on our infrastructure. What could go wrong?