• Ogmios@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    12·
    2 hours ago

    Didn’t go from anything to anything. Both are true. And you’re still causing far greater problems than anything you’ve solved.

    • Cypher@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      2 hours ago

      The problems are your hurt fee fees and they’re more important than the facts are they?

      • Ogmios@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        11·
        2 hours ago

        Have you seen how much of this post is you arguing with multiple people? You’re doing far more harm than good here.

        • Cypher@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          2 hours ago

          You could have just said you don’t know why those carbon rings are there or even (the horror) kept quiet.

          Instead you posted bullshit and got called out.

          I don’t care beyond telling you that you are full of shit and should know when to shut up.

            • Cypher@lemmy.worldEnglish
              1·
              2 hours ago

              I used one word in error.

              Wrong as I have already clearly stated.

              Carbon… which doesn’t fit nicely into the known laws of physics

              This is complete and utter bullshit and the fact you don’t understand this is really damning.

              Remember the actual question?

              What’s a carbon dust shell and why’s that cool?

              Carbon is well understood and behaves as expected. Science can and has explained why those carbon dust shells are present in the JWST image.

              So you didn’t address the question, you were wrong, and you’ve continued arguing about it because that’s what morons spreading misinformation do.