• icecreamtaco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago
    • SNES
    • Every handheld console except for the DS and Switch was a copypaste + upgrade from the last one. GB Pocket, GB Color, GB Advance, GBA SP, GBA Micro, DS Lite, 3DS, 2DS, New 3DS, 3DS XL
    • Amon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Every handheld console except for the DS

      I’m sorry but it is quite literally a GBA with an additional touchscreen and an ARM9 processor

      • SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        You’re dismissing that way too easily. A dual screen handheld was pretty game changing and not to mention touchscreen was not a standard back then.

    • f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      “The new console unfortunately is not backwards-compatible.” -> riots

      …versus…

      “The new console is backwards-compatible because it’s an upgraded version of the old console.” -> riots

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        You can be backwards compatible without just being a hardware revision. Look at the Wii, while it’s definitely built on the GameCube, it has many more features

    • morphballganon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      SNES was top loading with receding flaps. NES was front loading with a flap cover.

      Must I point out all of the changes, or can you do some critical thinking before you argue?