This thread was inappropriately censored by either @[email protected] or @[email protected] claiming:

“Reason: Reason: Literally the opposite of anti-work is “over employment” which OP is arguing for”

There is an English comprehension problem by the mod. Would someone whose first language is English please:

  1. notice that over employment is actually the problem that the thread’s thesis seeks remedies for. Being forced into a full-time or nothing ultamatim is a very common problem that oppresses anti-work proponents. It’s the single most common problem we face. Appalling that a mod would block the discussion.
  2. undo the improper mod action

The mod’s action to suppress is actually a pro-work action, as it prevents discussion around solutions to over-employment.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.netEnglish
    10·
    12 days ago

    Can you post a link or screenshot of the modlog to see the original text? Your link does not work for me.

    Personally, I find it frustrating that an instance that is either explicitly or implicitly supportive of anarchism uses the completely unaccountable moderation model from Reddit. I don’t want to start drama with specific users but this wouldn’t be the first time I’ve seen some pretty questionable mod actions on this instance, which is disappointing, given our shared ethos. I get that we’re stuck with the tools that Lemmy provides us which are very limited but I think there has got to be a better way somehow. In my view, this system inevitably leads to abuse, especially on contentious topics.

    • Comrade Spood@slrpnk.netEnglish
      2·
      9 hours ago

      This. We need to figure out a way to incorporate an anarchist approach to running communities and instances. In what way is a couple moderators controlling and making decisions for the userbase anarchist?

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.netEnglish
        1·
        7 hours ago

        Do you have any ideas or suggestions? It would be really helpful to have a model to follow instead of trying to invent one. I tried to investigate the moderation model on /r/anarchism but I didn’t find any real information.

    • activistPnk@slrpnk.netOPEnglish
      6·
      12 days ago
      original post text

      Progressive tax regimes are conducive to anti-work philosophy, right up until you take a year or more off.

      Having a progressive tax system means tax rate increases disproportionately with the more work you do. And that’s a good because working less is encouraged by a reduced avg tax rate.

      But what happens when you take a year (or 5 years) off? You live off savings that were taxed in higher brackets while earning zero. IOW, consider:

      • Bob works 6 years straight earning 50k/year.
      • Alice works 3 years earning 100k/year then takes 3 years off.

      They both had the same gross earnings per unit time but Alice gets screwed on taxes because of the progressive tax system. My pattern is comparable to Alice due to forced full-time gigs that refuse part-time. My refuge is to subject myself to being over-employed for a stretch then quitting for a stretch of bench time. The only remedies I see:

      1. Take a 1-year contract starting in June. Do not work the first ½ of the 1st year, and do not work the second ½ of the 2nd year.
      2. Form a corporation, work as independent and direct your own “false independent” 1-person company. Money builds in the company as you pay yourself the same amount whether you are working or not. (Some people put the company in Hong Kong because it accommodates this well and the company feeds the director gradually and persists well after retirement – or so I’m told)
      3. Work in a country that adjusts for income fluxuations by giving you a tax credit if your income drops substantially from one year to the next.

      I made up number 3. Does that exist anywhere?

      Any other techniques to hack around forced full-time scenarios? Or to deliberately fluxuate working hard and not working without the tax penalty?