(Go stick your head in a pig!)

Come to think of it, “share and enjoy” is exactly the way I would expect an AI-generated YouTube video to end.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Don’t really need to assume anything on this front,

    You literally just assumed I’m annoyed because it’s “pretty fucking obvious.” 🙄

    You invent your own world and try to warp everyone else to fit it.

    False assumption.

    Im sure it must be frustrating to be challenged like this

    False assumption.

    I can assure you that you hardly matter enough to make me hate you over any of this.

    Lie.

    You do make it quite entertaining, though . . .

    Likewise.

    • Sabre363@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      You invent your own world and try to warp everyone else to fit it.

      False assumption.

      Then prove otherwise and stop acting like a dumbass. Go back and answer my original question about your AI argument without the ego-trip and stop deciding you know the truth of my words or intentions. Only I can know my motivations, just like only you can know yours. We never needed to go down this path of fighting each other like toddlers over a cookie jar. We could’ve had a normal, healthy discussion about AI had you only decided to take my words at face value or accepted that I only ever wanted to talk. Whether I was/ am being honest about my intentions is completely irrelevant, this is the internet and you can say whatever you choose, even if someone is lying when they ask. Yet you persist with these unproductive accusations and now here we are

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Go back and answer my original question about your AI argument

        Sure. For the I don’t know how manyth time, my argument was: “be wary of AI.” And when I gave one of the reasons, because of the environmental mess it is causing, you dismissed it.

        You haven’t accepted that was my argument multiple times already, let’s see if you do this time. I doubt it.

        • Sabre363@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 minutes ago

          As I said before, “be wary of AI” isn’t much of argument as it’s not something we ever disagreed upon. I have never once said anything to the effect of; “AI is harmless and perfect and we should all use it willy-nilly without a care in the world”. In fact I’ve been trying to say the precise opposite this whole fucking time. If your only point was to be cautious of AI, then why the actual fuck are we fighting?

          Where I think we actually disagreed was in how to deal with AI and what ‘wary’ actually mean in this case. From everything I’d seen you appeared to support the burry your head in the sand and hope AI disappears approach, while I argued that we should all spend some time getting to understand the nuances of AI so that we can more easily recognize when its being misused. When I questioned you having an argument, I was openly inviting you to expand on your point and tell me what “being wary” meant to you and why that was important. I was attacking your argument as it seemed weak and I simply wanted to know more, I was not attacking you or your character (I apologize if it seemed otherwise).

          As for the environmental thing, I have, on multiple occasions, said exactly why I dismissed it and also explicitly invited you to bring it back into your argument as long as you did it without presuming to know what my take is before we even started discussing anything:

          …the ecological impact of AI is an entirely separate discussion, and I would appreciate it if you didn’t pretend to know my stance on the matter to support your arguments. If you want to have that discussion, we can, but not like this.

          …I did in fact comment on the environmental impact of AI. I told you I was choosing to ignore that point because I find the way that you brought it into the conversation to be childish and unproductive. It also has nothing to do with the correlation between the use of AI, careers, and the integration process of AI. Environmental impact is an engineering and sustainability problem, not a moral or ethical one. Different problem, different discussion.

          However, since you so clearly want to talk about the environmental impact of AI, lets hear that part of your argument and then I will tell you where I stand on the issue.