• ComradeMiao@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    55
    ·
    6 days ago

    Copyright infringement in China is awesome! It allows one to buy things at a fraction of the cost because of such competition. A lot of western brands’ factories sell the product locally unbranded for 1/10 of the price and it’s awesome

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Copyright infringement also means small creators get their lunch money stolen by big Chinese corporations. Copyright doesn’t just protect corpos.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Sure, at the cost of the people doing the work to design the product not being compensated for their labor.

          • Electricblush@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Yes, because that is where all the profit goes in Western companies, and not the CEO, upper management and stockholders…

            You are not wrong in assuming that exploited labor is being under compensated, but different models of labor exploitation aside, people actually making value are not the people reaping the benefits.

            • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Ok but it’s not done by a bunch of Robin Hoods, they rip off (read: steal and then destroy the economic capacity of) small/independent designers all the time too.

              • Electricblush@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                Oh absolutely, I was mainly targeting the notion that the way “legit” companies distribute the profits is somehow more fair.

                If anything these markets show what the actual cost of production is, so it shows how much profit could have been distributed to those actually producing the goods. (Including designers, factory workers etc)

                A lot more people could have sustainable incomes instead of CEOs getting their third yacht…

            • catloaf@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              That’s true, I would prefer the people doing the most work get the most reward. But currently they’re getting none, so I would settle for some.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            The ones designing the vast majority of IP are paid in wages, the ones who own the IP have not actually designed it, or played a minimal role, ie outlining what they want designed. Copyright is something that is truly unnecessary in general, it is at its best when protecting the vast minority of small producers who own their own designs and can actually afford to manufacture and sell them, but the bulk of the economy is not at all organized in such a fashion to begin with.