• Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      impossible to detect? No, extremly hard to identify what it is? yes.

      Who cares if they can see it’s 5 GB stream, they have no way of knowing whether or not it’s a pirated movie versus a backup from a home server or a data stream.

      In fact some vpns are actually starting to implement data buffering where it makes every request is the same size regardless of what it is to protect against AI Assisted traffic analysis

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        Plus, people are fighting detection too. Where “normal” VPN protocols are recognized and blocked, like China, people are trying to make them indistinguishable from normal HTTPS traffic.

        • Toes♀@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, if they wanted to setup deep packet inspection on that level. I’d imagine it would require billions of dollars in compute resources. And it would still suck.

    • heavydust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      There are a lot of industries where huge amount of data is moved all the time (health data, VMs, anything actually). Even small startups can do that and it’s cheaper than ever.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Heck a tiny regional bank I worked at with less than 2 dozen locations was constantly flinging data between its Primary and DR datacenters, and they were too small for any dedicated fiber so that was just over standard ISPs (with some locations technically on residential plans because the ISPs didn’t offer any better options than that in the small towns the bank supported)