Summary

Costco’s board rejected a shareholder proposal to end its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies, arguing they foster respect, innovation, and cultural alignment with customers and employees.

Shareholders claimed DEI could lead to lawsuits citing “illegal discrimination” against white, Asian, male, or straight employees, referencing legal cases like Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard.

Costco countered that its DEI efforts comply with the law and enhance its culture, rejecting claims of legal risk.

The proposal will be voted on at Costco’s January 23 shareholder meeting.

  • rabber
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I think that white people have better opportunities to get educated etc. Not that they are inherently better. Being born into a poor family is obviously going to present you with less opportunities. That’s a whole different problem unrelated to hiring practices though.

    Yeah men do make better leaders as we have seen all throughout human history. Queens were far more likely to wage war than kings, one example. Men and women are more different than they are the same. Not superior/inferior; just different.

    • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      just a reminder that this all started as your hatred for DEI which you did not understand. Do you still oppose it?

      • rabber
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I guess I am opposed to Affirmative Action?

        • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          I’m just gonna be blunt, I don’t think you understand the topic of workplace discrimination. If you can’t even parse DEI and demographically-driven hiring quotas it’s hard to take your broader opinions on discrimination in the workplace seriously. That’s like arguing about computers and thinking a hard drive and ram serve the same function because they both involve “memory.” You fundamentally misunderstand these systems.

          • rabber
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Maybe true. I’ll do more research going forward.

            Full disagree with you that I’m bigoted though. You mentioned women in executive positions. Women aren’t in executive positions because they don’t want to be, not the other way around.

              • rabber
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                I think that jobs held by women should be paid as much as jobs held by men though.

                There are no women fixing power lines despite nothing stopping them from doing so. Why? I can name a lot of example jobs like this. Executive roles are one of them.

                I’m not American so I’m unfamiliar with fox news talking points.

                • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 days ago

                  This is exactly how society talked about women going to college. Then in the 90’s-2010’s we prioritized getting rid of systemic barriers and addressing sexism. Now women actually outnumber men in college. Again, people talked the exact same way about women going to college for over half a century. Were they right? Or did it “sound” right so no one challenged it?

                  • rabber
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 days ago

                    OK, women in college. I like this topic. I think it’s wrong to encourage all women to go to college considering once they graduate and start a career the clock is ticking down for having kids. And I think this is the root cause of low birth rates in all egalitarian societies.

                    I think society should encourage women to prioritize being mothers first and to persue career second.

                    My experience isn’t everyone’s but my mom raised me till I was like 15 and then she went to college and started her career. I think this is optimal. My childhood was incredible. And because my mom had kids early, I now get to enjoy spending many more years with her than if she had done the college first thing.

                    Not opposed to feminism but very opposed to current wave feminism.

                    Also want to say I don’t think most men belong in college either. But it makes more sense for them to go to college as soon as possible as they are unable to have children. Right?

    • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Yes I really think men are more naturally inclined to do executive type roles. Men and women aren’t the same.

      I don’t really know how this jives with what you just wrote.

      Edit; you added a new section that honesty is just you trying to have your cake and eat it too

      • rabber
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Top 20 jobs held by men and women are the same list today as it was 100 years ago prior to feminism. Men tend to do certain jobs and women tend to do other jobs. This has rang true all throughout human history. It’s nothing to do with prejudice against women.