Trees used for materials are replaced by more trees. That’s more than “once”, and I spelled it out for you in that second paragraph already.
Anti-tree? Yeah, you literally seem to have a problem with the notion that specific varieties of tree are worth trying to save. You may not be anti-all-trees, but you’ve sure wasted some breath trash-talking a particularly useful type of tree.
I’m not going to dignify your lack of argument and ignoring my own arguments by specifically calling you anti-evergreen or some shit. Anti-tree it is.
You’re missing the point that trees will only sequester a limited amount of carbon, once.
Yeah, I’m all for planting more trees, that’s always good. Calling me “anti tree” is just “I have no good argument so I’ll just throw insults”
Trees used for materials are replaced by more trees. That’s more than “once”, and I spelled it out for you in that second paragraph already.
Anti-tree? Yeah, you literally seem to have a problem with the notion that specific varieties of tree are worth trying to save. You may not be anti-all-trees, but you’ve sure wasted some breath trash-talking a particularly useful type of tree.
I’m not going to dignify your lack of argument and ignoring my own arguments by specifically calling you anti-evergreen or some shit. Anti-tree it is.