• GoodEye8@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you think “I don’t like tattoos on women” is the same as “women with tattoos look like vandalized buildings” then you’re missing the nuances necessary to have this discussion.

    • Ougie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      First of all I didn’t say any of these things. You assumed both. Personally I don’t like tagging, which is not the same as graffiti. Graffiti art can be great. There’s street art out there that’s breathtaking. Same for tattoos. For starters I never distinguished between men and women. You did that. I have nothing against tattoos as a general concept. I’m not a fan of this particular style of cliché designs scattered about.

      Here’s my perspective on tattoos if you’re interested: In western cultures tattoos started out as distinguishers of society’s outcasts, prisoners etc. Their popularisation in the last few decades began from successful individuals who somehow “made it” in life. Rock stars, football players etc, usually people from lower or middle class families who made a lot of money. For them unconsciously tattoos in visible places signify that they are successful in an unorthodox way, it shows to everyone that they can be different, they can stand out because they have money and they don’t need an employer/ master, they don’t need to look presentable, wear a suit (uniform) to work etc. In essence they’re free from the shackles of labour. Tattoos became a sign of individuality and success in that way. Nowadays that everyone and their mother has tattoos and nobody cares anymore, in order to serve their purpose they need to be more and more outlandish and provocative, hence the face tattoo fad etc. I predict that in a few years from now kids will reject the concept and it might even be cool not to have them.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        How about you don’t assume what I’m saying and you read what I’m actually saying. I never said you stated either of those things. I said if you can’t tell the difference between the two statements it’s pointless to explain how that meme is political.

        • Ougie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          The only way this is “political” is in a twisted american way where the only difference between the two parties available is that the dems are somehow lefties because of their more accepting views on social matters like abortion and the lgbt community, compared to the utterly deranged nazi right. Well newsflash, acceptance of peoples’ appearance is fundamental understanding of human rights and there’s nothing wrong with expressing one’s dislike of a certain style. One does not negate the other. Political is class warfare, freedom of speech and expression, not some stupid tattoos.

          • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            acceptance of peoples’ appearance is fundamental understanding of human rights and there’s nothing wrong with expressing one’s dislike of a certain style.

            Are you saying it’s okay to say you don’t like black people? The color of your skin is as fundamental as your appearance can get and if there’s nothing wrong with expressing dislike about certain appearances then surely there’s nothing wrong with saying you don’t like black people. Actually, let’s not soften that statement. According to you there’s nothing wrong with hating black people because it’s just expressing a dislike. I could just as easily use that to say it’s okay to hate women too. I could probably also fit jews, arabs and other ethnic groups (as long as they dress in a certain way)

            And this is the issue with your opinion. It’s so blunt and devoid on any nuance that it can be twisted to mean whatever it needs to mean at any given moment. So yeah, of course according to you it’s not political. Nothing even remotely related to appearance is political.

              • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                Somehow I just knew you were going to hide behind that one word. So let me get this straight, it’s not okay to hate of black people based on their skin color but it’s completely okay to hate them based on how they dress?

                • Ougie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  Bro are you dense? Who said anything about hate? I don’t think those tattoos look nice ok? I think she would look better without them or if she’d gone with something else. I don’t know what you’re trying to make out of this but it’s ok not to like some things in life. I don’t like this type of apartment building either, they were mass produced in the 70s probably and they’re made of crappy materials, the balconies and windows are not large enough and the walls have a shitty texture that gathers dust. I don’t like fur, it looks tacky. I don’t like bright red lipstick, it looks cheap. In fact I don’t like red anything. There’s always a better colour for everything. Don’t agree? Watch me not giving a fuck. Bet you have your own aesthetic and I’m sure it’s totally different to mine. Good on ya. It’s not political, get over it.