• TheFonz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I think we can track down several times two state option was on the table, starting as early as 68

      • TheFonz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        What is the benefit from lying? I don’t get it. This is all basic info.

        The two-state solution is supported by many countries, and the Palestinian Authority. Israel currently does not support the idea, though it has in the past. The first proposal for separate Jewish and Arab states in the territory was made by the British Peel Commission report in 1937.

        It was also on the table at Camp David.

        • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          How does that prove they’re lying about Israel currently not supporting it?

          Right now they’re wanting to just take the land after eliminating the people who lived there

          • TheFonz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Because I said it was on the table several times in the past. And they wrote:

            Very cool and false

            ???

            • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Yes because they’ve (Israel) always negotiated in good faith. Even the camp David accords was a 2 state solution in name only

              • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Well, there you have it. The most unproductive statements as usual. If you don’t know the specifics, why comment? Why not discuss the actual policies or the historical details? Why live in the realm of memes and buzzwords? Oh wait… I know why

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          Ok now explain why Israel does not accept the deal since Hamas does accept it.

          I do not have to read any history to disprove your lies. I can open the news right now.