Well, that’s cool and all but you haven’t addressed anything I wrote.
What does
“traditional binary understanding of gender based on biological sex”
do to explain individuals that are born intersex? Or with chromosome xx but female biological sex organs? Etc etc.
Please address what I actually wrote.
We haven’t even began to discuss concepts such as gender. We haven’t moved past fifth grade biology in this conversation yet.
If you spent more than five minutes looking into this you’d understand that there’s a whole lot more to it than presentation. Some people are born intersex. Some biological women are born with two xx chromosomes. Some biological men are born with xy chromosomes. Etc etc. It’s nice that your mom and sister have it all clear. A good portion of humanity has to fight to explain their place every day
Our deductible was about 6,500. It depends what kind of plan you’re on
Yea i admit I don’t know. What special knowledge are you holding back from us? Would love to learn more about why eastern civ is left out of the party
Haha what a wall of text but not a single response to the original question. It’s like the 6th wall of text from you but at no point do you engage with the topic.
This is the laziest form of trolling. I suppose everyone needs a hobby
I’m just a little perplexed. Why not “fuck all civilization”? Seems peculiar to identify each distinct civilization segment but OK
Bit out of left field but ok
I see. This makes sense. I was hoping for some complex mysterious motivation for these types of comments. Moving on I guess. 🙂
So you don’t have an answer for why you escalated so fast to name calling. It’s just second nature to you. Got it.
You’re obsessed with this singular logical example I provided but you refuse to answer my main question. It’s odd.
I’m going to ask again: what about someone declaring “down votes don’t affect behavioral outcomes” made you go straight to: “wow. You have so much in common with nazis”.
I’ve asked this like three or four times, and each reply you write focuses only on the bad logic about the analogy I provided earlier.
Why won’t you answer my main question? Is it because it makes you seem unhinged? I’m not interested in judging you. I’m just curious why? Why was that the first thing that you thought to write? Why won’t you answer this question? So far you’ve only talked about the analogy I gave and it’s been like three or four replies. I’m really curious.
Yea i deleted the comments because they weren’t constructive and it seemed you wanted to talk about anything except the main thing I (and others) have highlighted for you so what’s the point.
It’s an unusual scenario that I’ve found is very typical of this particular platform and I’m very intrigued by this phenomenon. A really high percentage of conversations here seems very invested in labeling the other rather than addressing the argument presented. It’s particularly felt on Lemmy. It’s probably trivial to you, but it’s so frequent in my experience here that I’m beginning to wonder what about this place drives every conversation into an instant indictment of the other?
For instance, I’m really curious why in this particular case when someone pointed out why downvoting has little to no effect in changing behavioral outcomes your first instinct was to classify that person into the same category as the initial example?
Like, what led you to seek out that indictment in situ right out of the bat? Was it the way they phrased it? Did it remind you of a past story or example?
What aspect of the statement:
“down votes are not compelling”
made you go straight to : "aha! You have commonality with Nazis! "?
Pot: Meet kettle.
Jfc. You can’t make this up
No man there is no white knight complex. Again, with the weird labels.
However, there is a weird fixation with users on this platform unable to engage with a topic without having to categorize and label whoever they are engaging with.
For instance: Someone pointed out an extremely neutral fact and it went straight to “well you’re a nazi”. It’s kinda sad and ultimately I just question what even is the point of discussing anything on this platform when it will always escalate within 1-2 comments to boxing someone into some kind of ad hominem or label the way you did?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
That’s… not what they are saying. They are critiquing the strategy. If nazzis and I agree 1+1 makes 2 that doesn’t mean we’re all Nazzis.
I don’t understand why so many struggle with addressing the message and are so eager to shoot the messenger. It’s weird but really common on Lemmy.
Yea of course. As professionals our window to do tech support is limited.
I’m living in an episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm. This is the only explanation.