Doug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoThe behavior of the devoutlemmy.worldimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1229arrow-down118
arrow-up1211arrow-down1imageThe behavior of the devoutlemmy.worldDoug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareGHiLA@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 months ago If you claim God does not exist, you get the burden of proof This is only true if the general consensus is “God exists”. If no one has any concept of God to begin with, then what are you arguing?
minus-squareDiplomjodler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoIf you have to invent hypothetical scenarios to make your argument sound plausible, it’s probably not a good argument.
minus-squareGHiLA@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoConsidering God is entirely hypothetical, I agree.
This is only true if the general consensus is “God exists”.
If no one has any concept of God to begin with, then what are you arguing?
If you have to invent hypothetical scenarios to make your argument sound plausible, it’s probably not a good argument.
Considering God is entirely hypothetical, I agree.