• Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Tbf legendary Jesus probably never existed, at least as a single individual. But the teachings are well-ahead of his times, and sadly, apparently, well-ahead of ours.

    I wish I could have a conversation with Vonnegut, though, over whiskey and cigars, about Cat’s Cradle.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        No need to have illusions over any religion, because illusions lead to delusions. I refer to what I was indoctrinated into more often than other religions because that’s what I’m most familiar with; but I tend to take what I want and discard what I don’t, from all of them.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      But the teachings are well-ahead of his times

      Not really, most of it is copy-pasted from either contemporaries (abandon your family and follow me), or from much older sources (treat others how you want to be treated).

      • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Jesus himself said that none of his teaching was new, he taught the Torah to Jews, even “love your enemy” is an application of Leviticus 19:18

        He gave one “new” command: love one another in the way I’ve shown you. (John 13:34)

        The golden rule was not unique to Christianity, but the founder illustrating that love ought to be self-sacrificing and leading by example was new.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I didn’t answer that person because it seems so obvious, by looking around us and at ourselves that if we haven’t mastered the lesson, it’s certainly ahead of our time.

          "Abandoned family…” not like he was married, and left a wife and child destitute. Neither did Siddhartha, his spouse and child remained in luxury afaict but who knows?