from the the-real-agenda dept

    • Fusty@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wikipedia is a collection of random statements, I don’t go to that side. Wikipedia does not accuratly ddscribe the things that I’m against, and it does not properly explain the things that I support.

      • Chais@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        What do you mean? I usually find Wikipedia’s explanations quite helpful. Maybe a little heady at times, but always factual.

      • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        What a reductive way to look at information. I could send you all of the sourced links at the bottom of the page but then you’d come up with another excuse to not read anything and just complain.