• Hubi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    172
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yoon cited a motion by the country’s opposition Democratic Party, which has a majority in parliament, this week to impeach some of the country’s top prosecutors and its rejection of a government budget proposal.

    They declared martial law over a budget proposal??

        • Nighed@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          64
          ·
          1 day ago

          Don’t hold you breath…

          From BBC:

          The South Korean military says it will maintain martial law until it is lifted by President Yoon Suk Yeol, despite the nation’s parliament voting to block its enforcement, according to the country’s national broadcaster.

          • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah this is 100% a power grab. AFAIK there’s nothing going on right now in SK at a national level that could possibly justify the declaration of martial law countrywide.

          • perestroika@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            As far as I understand, the president’s decision might be void, since he was required to hold a session of the government before declaring martial law, but did not.

            I predict that the military will consult their lawyers and stop enforcing it really soon.

            I suspect the president either went insane or attempted some kind of a coup. His own party voting against his decision is a clear signal that it’s a solo performance. He has no political backing.

            • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              1 day ago

              I mean… if the military is behind the president (and it sounds like they just might be), this is just the beginning phase of a coup, wherein their legislature is taken out behind the shed.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                This is hours old, I think there might be a couple generals for sure, but the rest of the military is playing catch up. We’ll see how those chips fell tomorrow morning most likely.

              • perestroika@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Judging by the unanimous decision of the parliament, the majority of soldiers will have no interest in going forward with a coup. A minority could have interest, but would soon notice they’re a minority.

        • ILikeBoobies
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Under martial law parliament is suspended so the vote was symbolic

          • Furball@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            1 day ago

            Not exactly, under the constitution if the parliament votes to suspend martial law the president must end it. A constitutional crisis is brewing

          • perestroika@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Technically it might be, but all political power stems from the people agreeing to be governed. If they aren’t represented, they won’t agree to be governed for long.

            Basically, the parliament can’t afford to let itself be suspended. It’s needed because the president is going to get dismissed after this kind of behaviour.

      • Invertedouroboros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        So, the following is a genuine question and not a snide remark.

        Does that matter? Is the military going to respect that? I’d heard prior to this that the military had forbade parliament from gathering. What’s to say they don’t just side with Yoon?Certainly wouldn’t be the first time in history that a nation’s military has dictated the corse of the nation’s civil future. I really hate asking questions like this but I’m just not familiar enough with the politics of South Korea to know if this a done and dusted thing or if the military is likely to go for a coup if Yoon pitches it.

    • clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes. This possibility has been discussed for months now. Yoon framed the cuts to his proposed budget as an “act of sympathy to the North” in his speech.

    • SoupBrick@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Maybe, keep in mind that reporting is going off the information they have. It might be deeper than that. Only time will tell.