• phx
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, this feels like a good place for Hydrogen power to step in.

    One of the oft repeated concerns is that generating hydrogen to power vehicles the takes a lot of energy, which often comes from dirty sources.

    One of the oft repeated issues for solar (or wind etc) is that it’s available at certain times and not in and of itself storable or transportable, so excess is lost.

    So, take the excess solar energy, produce hydrogen and store for off-peak times or to distribute.

    Seems like a win to me.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      So, take the excess solar energy, produce hydrogen and store for off-peak times or to distribute.

      Storing hydrogen is difficult and expensive. Not even to say it can’t be done, but it would require the energy companies to invest money in capital, and they hate doing that.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      And this involves only driving in summer when there is excess energy? Or getting through winter by storing enough hydrogen to make the Beirut explosion look like a firecracker in comparison?

        • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          That sounds fun. Not only are we already losing ton of energy to create the hydrogen, we can now lose even more and make it more expensive by trying to liquefy/compress it to make it somewhat transportable. [1]

          Also, almost 90% of humans living in the northen hemisphere will surely not cause any issues to this plan. [2]

          • phx
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            You’re not LOSING anything if it’s capturing already excess energy, which would by its nature be lost if not used at the time of generation

            • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              Neither solar panels, nor hydrogen generators are free. If you need to build extra panels and hydrogen generators, you are making the infrastructure more expensive, consequently raising electricity prices. Or hydrogen prices if you use it as fuel instead of power storage.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        That’s funny, but modern solar panel power plants don’t care that it’s winter. The panels rotate and an arid area isn’t getting that much more cloud cover.

        • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          The article says the ones it talks about do. Also, rotating panels can’t stop days from being shorter during winter.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I’m not saying it’s not lower. I’m saying it’s not nearly as big of a deal as people say it is.