Joker@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 day agoEvil company vs artistsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1685arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1678arrow-down1imageEvil company vs artistsh.itjust.worksJoker@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square49fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarepuppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down3·23 hours agoI’m not asserting anything, I was asking why he was asserting that it was definitively vandalism lol
minus-squareWhelks_chance@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·19 hours agoIf they had paid for use of the wall it would be very easy for them to prove it’s not vandalism. They’ve never said they had permission, that I’m aware of. Can you link to them saying they do?
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 hours agoThe point is we don’t know, so we can’t be sure it’s vandalism. We just don’t know.
minus-squarezaph@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·17 hours agoIt makes money to have a famous artist give them free art
minus-squarepuppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·17 hours agodude. as I just said im literally not trying to make a point, I don’t care enough to find a link or whatever. please get off my booty cheeks lmao
I’m not asserting anything, I was asking why he was asserting that it was definitively vandalism lol
If they had paid for use of the wall it would be very easy for them to prove it’s not vandalism. They’ve never said they had permission, that I’m aware of. Can you link to them saying they do?
The point is we don’t know, so we can’t be sure it’s vandalism. We just don’t know.
It makes money to have a famous artist give them free art
dude. as I just said im literally not trying to make a point, I don’t care enough to find a link or whatever. please get off my booty cheeks lmao