🃏Joker@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 month agoEvil company vs artistsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1735arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1728arrow-down1imageEvil company vs artistsh.itjust.works🃏Joker@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square51fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareWhelks_chance@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 month agoIf they had paid for use of the wall it would be very easy for them to prove it’s not vandalism. They’ve never said they had permission, that I’m aware of. Can you link to them saying they do?
minus-squarezaph@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoIt makes money to have a famous artist give them free art
minus-squarepuppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agodude. as I just said im literally not trying to make a point, I don’t care enough to find a link or whatever. please get off my booty cheeks lmao
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoThe point is we don’t know, so we can’t be sure it’s vandalism. We just don’t know.
If they had paid for use of the wall it would be very easy for them to prove it’s not vandalism. They’ve never said they had permission, that I’m aware of. Can you link to them saying they do?
It makes money to have a famous artist give them free art
dude. as I just said im literally not trying to make a point, I don’t care enough to find a link or whatever. please get off my booty cheeks lmao
The point is we don’t know, so we can’t be sure it’s vandalism. We just don’t know.