• commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    a large portion of the land used to raise livestock are grasslands. what portion of feed they are given is also, largely, crop seconds or industrial byproduct. the source for your owid link is largely poore-nemecek, a paper I would trust to tell me the co2e of co2

    • seeking_perhaps@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’d like to see a source for “what portion of feed they are given is also, largely, crop seconds or industrial byproduct”. The vast majority of information I have seen on this topic is that we produce more crops specifically to feed animals than we do to feed humans. Which, just from an energy perspective, is completely logical to me.

        • seeking_perhaps@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 minutes ago

          I don’t see how this supports your argument that eliminating livestock would not reduce land usage. 76% of soybean production is going to animal feed, do you really think that percentage would not reduce if you switched it over to providing food for humans?

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 minutes ago

            69% is a byproduct of soybean oil production. most people don’t want to eat soy cake. some people already do, but not enough to eat the entire crop. giving that to livestock is a conservation of resources.